South Gloucestershire, in numbers

Your area

South Gloucestershire council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Neighbourhood differences

Homes rented privately

8.6% to 31.2%

Homes rented privately ranged from 8.6% in Frampton Cotterell to 31.2% in Bradley Stoke South — a gap of 22.7 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 28 of 28 current wards with comparable figures.

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Homes rented privately · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Frampton Cotterell	8.6%	457	5,321
Longwell Green	10.7%	460	4,291
Bitton & Oldland Common	11.1%	428	3,867
Winterbourne	11.1%	339	3,044
Frenchay & Downend	11.2%	619	5,550
Thornbury	11.2%	684	6,107
Severn Vale	11.3%	439	3,898
Charfield	11.3%	199	1,765
Hanham	11.6%	629	5,437
Boyd Valley	11.7%	431	3,694
New Cheltenham	12.3%	456	3,712
Yate Central	12.9%	495	3,843
Yate North	13.1%	669	5,107
Chipping Sodbury & Cotswold Edge	13.5%	576	4,264
Pilning & Severn Beach	13.8%	280	2,030
Parkwall & Warmley	14%	547	3,917
Woodstock	14.5%	614	4,244
Patchway Coniston	15.1%	347	2,297
Dodington	16.4%	649	3,950
Staple Hill & Mangotsfield	16.5%	1,060	6,422
Emersons Green	17%	1,159	6,810
Stoke Gifford	17.7%	1,022	5,788
Charlton & Cribbs	17.9%	674	3,771
Kingswood	23.5%	917	3,898
Filton	26.3%	1,205	4,590
Bradley Stoke North	30.6%	1,409	4,609
Stoke Park & Cheswick	30.7%	612	1,991
Bradley Stoke South	31.2%	1,212	3,879

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People reporting bad or very bad health

2.8% to 5.6%

People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.8% in Stoke Park & Cheswick to 5.6% in Woodstock — a gap of 2.9 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 28 of 28 current wards with comparable figures.

Residents described their own health. Differences in age matter, so this is a prompt to investigate needs, not a score for local health services.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People reporting bad or very bad health · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Stoke Park & Cheswick	2.8%	212	7,654
Emersons Green	2.8%	488	17,341
Bradley Stoke North	2.9%	324	11,065
Bradley Stoke South	3%	285	9,619
Stoke Gifford	3.6%	508	14,199
Charlton & Cribbs	3.7%	348	9,416
Severn Vale	3.8%	367	9,616
Chipping Sodbury & Cotswold Edge	4%	403	10,038
Frampton Cotterell	4%	532	13,236
Frenchay & Downend	4%	555	13,736
Bitton & Oldland Common	4.1%	384	9,458
Thornbury	4.3%	622	14,485
Yate North	4.3%	531	12,346
Boyd Valley	4.4%	403	9,235
Filton	4.4%	500	11,295
Longwell Green	4.4%	439	9,889
Parkwall & Warmley	4.5%	411	9,230
Pilning & Severn Beach	4.5%	217	4,847
Dodington	4.5%	445	9,886
Charfield	4.5%	239	5,277
Hanham	4.7%	613	13,064
Winterbourne	4.8%	363	7,604
Kingswood	4.9%	439	9,007
New Cheltenham	4.9%	443	9,047
Yate Central	5.2%	481	9,196
Patchway Coniston	5.3%	287	5,409
Staple Hill & Mangotsfield	5.4%	812	15,035
Woodstock	5.6%	573	10,189

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 65 or over

4.4% to 27.8%

People aged 65 or over ranged from 4.4% in Stoke Park & Cheswick to 27.8% in Severn Vale — a gap of 23.3 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 28 of 28 current wards with comparable figures.

Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 65 or over · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Stoke Park & Cheswick	4.4%	339	7,655
Bradley Stoke South	8.3%	794	9,618
Charlton & Cribbs	8.4%	787	9,417
Emersons Green	11.7%	2,032	17,341
Bradley Stoke North	13.7%	1,517	11,065
Patchway Coniston	14.7%	795	5,415
Stoke Gifford	15.5%	2,204	14,202
Kingswood	15.6%	1,409	9,007
Filton	15.8%	1,786	11,293
Dodington	16.7%	1,647	9,885
Charfield	17.2%	909	5,274
Parkwall & Warmley	17.4%	1,610	9,231
Yate North	18%	2,224	12,343
New Cheltenham	18.5%	1,672	9,047
Staple Hill & Mangotsfield	18.6%	2,803	15,038
Woodstock	20.3%	2,068	10,189
Bitton & Oldland Common	21%	1,990	9,456
Hanham	21.7%	2,842	13,068
Pilning & Severn Beach	22.6%	1,095	4,846
Yate Central	23%	2,120	9,200
Thornbury	23.3%	3,371	14,485
Frenchay & Downend	23.5%	3,226	13,733
Longwell Green	23.6%	2,337	9,890
Winterbourne	23.8%	1,811	7,604
Frampton Cotterell	24.4%	3,226	13,238
Boyd Valley	25.2%	2,328	9,234
Chipping Sodbury & Cotswold Edge	25.7%	2,580	10,035
Severn Vale	27.8%	2,671	9,618

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

4.2% to 21.9%

People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 4.2% in Stoke Park & Cheswick to 21.9% in Patchway Coniston — a gap of 17.6 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 28 of 28 current wards with comparable figures.

Formal qualifications are only one part of someone's skills. Training decisions also need current vacancies, employment and residents' experience.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 16+ with no qualifications · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Stoke Park & Cheswick	4.2%	286	6,750
Bradley Stoke South	8.9%	680	7,633
Emersons Green	10.4%	1,384	13,296
Bradley Stoke North	10.5%	949	9,004
Severn Vale	11.1%	892	8,057
Thornbury	11.7%	1,372	11,720
Stoke Gifford	11.9%	1,368	11,523
Charlton & Cribbs	12.6%	909	7,190
Charfield	12.7%	561	4,419
Frenchay & Downend	13.3%	1,502	11,299
Chipping Sodbury & Cotswold Edge	13.6%	1,143	8,411
Filton	14.1%	1,362	9,645
Winterbourne	14.3%	891	6,236
Bitton & Oldland Common	14.3%	1,107	7,746
Yate North	14.4%	1,462	10,121
Dodington	14.5%	1,143	7,865
Frampton Cotterell	14.5%	1,588	10,925
Boyd Valley	15.6%	1,215	7,811
Hanham	15.8%	1,694	10,710
Longwell Green	16%	1,325	8,281
Parkwall & Warmley	17.3%	1,326	7,674
New Cheltenham	17.7%	1,295	7,327
Staple Hill & Mangotsfield	17.9%	2,157	12,076
Kingswood	17.9%	1,329	7,406
Pilning & Severn Beach	18.5%	751	4,053
Yate Central	19.4%	1,462	7,530
Woodstock	20.3%	1,703	8,376
Patchway Coniston	21.9%	935	4,276

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

21.9% to 42.9%

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent ranged from 21.9% in Patchway Coniston to 42.9% in Severn Vale — a gap of 21 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 28 of 28 current wards with comparable figures.

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Patchway Coniston	21.9%	937	4,276
Dodington	22.1%	1,737	7,865
Woodstock	22.9%	1,919	8,376
Yate Central	23.1%	1,742	7,530
New Cheltenham	24.8%	1,817	7,327
Parkwall & Warmley	26.5%	2,031	7,674
Longwell Green	26.7%	2,207	8,281
Pilning & Severn Beach	27.3%	1,106	4,053
Kingswood	27.8%	2,056	7,406
Yate North	27.8%	2,813	10,121
Hanham	28.2%	3,015	10,710
Bitton & Oldland Common	28.2%	2,188	7,746
Staple Hill & Mangotsfield	30.1%	3,639	12,076
Stoke Park & Cheswick	33.6%	2,267	6,750
Filton	33.8%	3,263	9,645
Charfield	34%	1,504	4,419
Boyd Valley	34.3%	2,676	7,811
Frampton Cotterell	34.7%	3,792	10,925
Winterbourne	36.8%	2,295	6,236
Emersons Green	38.3%	5,087	13,296
Chipping Sodbury & Cotswold Edge	38.4%	3,230	8,411
Stoke Gifford	38.6%	4,445	11,523
Frenchay & Downend	39.4%	4,456	11,299
Bradley Stoke North	39.6%	3,570	9,004
Thornbury	40.7%	4,766	11,720
Charlton & Cribbs	40.9%	2,944	7,190
Bradley Stoke South	42.9%	3,272	7,633
Severn Vale	42.9%	3,457	8,057

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

8.6% to 19.4%

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 8.6% in Charfield to 19.4% in Patchway Coniston — a gap of 10.8 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 28 of 28 current wards with comparable figures.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Charfield	8.6%	152	1,764
Bradley Stoke South	9.1%	355	3,884
Severn Vale	9.4%	367	3,900
Bradley Stoke North	9.6%	443	4,607
Frenchay & Downend	10.1%	562	5,550
Emersons Green	10.6%	720	6,809
Chipping Sodbury & Cotswold Edge	10.8%	459	4,267
Stoke Gifford	11.1%	643	5,788
Boyd Valley	11.6%	427	3,696
Winterbourne	11.7%	356	3,043
Bitton & Oldland Common	11.8%	458	3,870
Frampton Cotterell	11.9%	634	5,321
Thornbury	12.2%	746	6,108
Stoke Park & Cheswick	12.3%	245	1,991
Dodington	13%	513	3,950
Yate North	13.1%	669	5,107
Charlton & Cribbs	13.5%	510	3,767
Longwell Green	13.5%	581	4,290
Parkwall & Warmley	14.1%	552	3,917
Pilning & Severn Beach	15%	304	2,031
Hanham	15.9%	865	5,435
Kingswood	16.2%	632	3,898
New Cheltenham	16.3%	604	3,712
Yate Central	17.1%	658	3,843
Filton	17.9%	821	4,593
Woodstock	18.9%	803	4,248
Staple Hill & Mangotsfield	19.4%	1,244	6,424
Patchway Coniston	19.4%	444	2,292

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

1.4% to 24.5%

Homes rented from a council or housing association ranged from 1.4% in Bradley Stoke North to 24.5% in Patchway Coniston — a gap of 23.1 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 28 of 28 current wards with comparable figures.

The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Homes rented from a council or housing association · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Bradley Stoke North	1.4%	64	4,609
Dodington	3.3%	131	3,950
Frenchay & Downend	5.4%	301	5,550
Pilning & Severn Beach	5.5%	111	2,030
Severn Vale	5.9%	229	3,898
Bitton & Oldland Common	7.7%	297	3,867
Frampton Cotterell	8.3%	443	5,321
Charfield	8.5%	150	1,765
Bradley Stoke South	8.8%	340	3,879
Winterbourne	8.9%	271	3,044
Stoke Gifford	8.9%	517	5,788
Longwell Green	8.9%	384	4,291
Boyd Valley	9.1%	337	3,694
Hanham	9.3%	505	5,437
Yate North	10.1%	514	5,107
Chipping Sodbury & Cotswold Edge	10.6%	451	4,264
Kingswood	11.3%	439	3,898
Thornbury	11.4%	699	6,107
Yate Central	11.7%	448	3,843
Emersons Green	11.7%	796	6,810
Filton	13.4%	615	4,590
Parkwall & Warmley	13.5%	528	3,917
New Cheltenham	15.9%	592	3,712
Stoke Park & Cheswick	16.8%	334	1,991
Woodstock	17.7%	752	4,244
Staple Hill & Mangotsfield	18.7%	1,198	6,422
Charlton & Cribbs	19.3%	729	3,771
Patchway Coniston	24.5%	563	2,297

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

28 mapped electoral wards · May 2026. The same wards are available in the named list below. These are council boundaries, not police neighbourhoods.

Choose a ward

These are electoral wards or the explicitly labelled statistical equivalents. They do not necessarily match villages, parishes or police neighbourhoods.